Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.

Why Build 5384?
Windows 2000 was build 2195 & Windows XP SP2 was build 2600 so I guess they carried on from there "Mario Rosario" wrote in message
Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
I'd more readily point out that 15 years ago was relatively close to NT 3.1 days than DOS.
"Mario Rosario" wrote in message
Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
? 12 years ago was windows 95 beta build. Their was a much bigger gap ,then 3 years, before the first build of DOS and windows 95 :)
So we have to assume that Microsoft make more then one build a day?
Stephan
Actually they probably had to skip a bunch of build numbers when they started longhorn. They have engineers working on several trees at once, while the initial Longhorn engineers were starting their builds, other engineers were still working on the XP branch working on SP 2, and the other bug fixes that they are building, right?
"Stephan Schaem" wrote in message
"Mario Rosario" wrote in message Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
? 12 years ago was windows 95 beta build. Their was a much bigger gap ,then 3 years, before the first build of DOS and windows 95 :)
So we have to assume that Microsoft make more then one build a day?
Stephan
First off the build is 5384.4 Once Beta 2 was done they started work on RC1 which is the 5400 branch. "Mario Rosario" wrote in message
Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
They started work on the RC1 branch before Beta 2 was completed ---------- Mark Dietz PROnetworks <http://www.pro-networks.org> http://imnuts.gotdns.org/blog/
SAM-R wrote:
First off the build is 5384.4 Once Beta 2 was done they started work on RC1 which is the 5400 branch. "Mario Rosario" wrote in message Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
For convenience, I used an average of 1 day per build to do the estimate.
Builds are done one after another around the clock, each build contains targeted bug fixes. Then it is sent to QA for testing.
I am guessing that it probably take 2 or even 3 days to completely build Vista from scratch. Back in the early 90s, System 5 Release 4 took almost 2 days to build. But the machines were slower then.
"Stephan Schaem" wrote in message
"Mario Rosario" wrote in message Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
? 12 years ago was windows 95 beta build. Their was a much bigger gap ,then 3 years, before the first build of DOS and windows 95 :)
So we have to assume that Microsoft make more then one build a day?
Stephan
So you're saying this number is arbitrary.
"SAM-R" wrote in message
First off the build is 5384.4 Once Beta 2 was done they started work on RC1 which is the 5400 branch. "Mario Rosario" wrote in message Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
Somewhat. I read in an MS blog that XP's 2600 was arbitrary in the sense that they rounded because they felt it just looked nicer for the released version. I'm serious.
Maybe somebody here remembers what the last Whistler build was.
"Mario Rosario" wrote in message
So you're saying this number is arbitrary.
"SAM-R" wrote in message First off the build is 5384.4 Once Beta 2 was done they started work on RC1 which is the 5400 branch. "Mario Rosario" wrote in message Anyone know why this is build 5384? Did they start with build 1? And if it takes 1 day to do a build then 5384 / 356 days/yr = 15 years? 15 years ago was DOS era.
Windows Vista
User login
Related topics
- Mouse - Vista
- VMWare in Windows Vista Beta 2
- Vista Download Server Busy
- Vista 5308 domain logon over wireless
- no reboot after updates applied
- Upgrade 5831 to 5384
- 64-Bit Vista Sound Cards
- Unable to start installation
- System Hardware Upgrade Analyzer
- nvidia asus enhanced drivers
- Compact in Maintenance - Missing?
- Explorer.EXE crashes when it tries to run
- Windows Exploer and Network troubles
- Wireless issue
- Just installed Vista
- I dint see my other computers on the network
- Runnign Vista x86 Upgrade Install from XP SP2
- help
- INSTALL 64
- HP Printers
- vista interim
- Feature I would Like To See
- Nice, I am loving
- ftp with DreamWeaver 8
- News: Vista PC Syncronization Removed
- Cannot Connect to Network $ Shares
- Windows Mail (Catch up & IMAP new mail notification)
- USB Modem drivers wont install
- error code 800705aa
- Problems running multple sound devices
- Palm Hotsync w/vista
- Webdav connection
- Updated Windows Mobile Device Center sync with Outlook 2007
- Network does not work on my Vista
- Testing for Port 80
- Virtual Server 2005 R2 is FREE!
- Can only open certain websites